The First men preganacy – A true story
Shocking to hear???? Yes, I read this few days back.
Lee Mingwei is known to be the first pregant men. Is he crazy or what? An excerpt of this true story is below. Male pregnancy may prove to be an extremely dangerous, particularly when your doctors perform your Cesarian operation. When asked him, Why have you chosen to do this?
“A lot of people have cast this endeavor as something terribly monstrous – a startling example of how science and medicine have simply gone too far. From my perspective, however, I am simply bringing a child into this world. There is nothing more natural and beautiful on this earth than that. This is something that I’ve always wanted to do” 
But we people find idea of a pregnant man disturbing.It is a shocking concept. Women have always given birth to children, and men have not. We call his effort a sexual revolution? Now, we have many question to consider.
*Why shouldn’t men carry children and care for a fetus the same way a women does?
*Why shouldn’t a man bear a burden that women have always carried?
*why shouldn’t a man be able to experience the same joy and excitement that a pregnant woman feels nurturing a child within her own body?
There ia a popular American film where Arnold Schwarzenegger’s character became pregnant. Now it is a reality. Where this science and technology takes our world? Thinking.
March 22nd, 2008 at 4:11 pm
Sounds really awful. A man being pregnant total bullshit. This is bad example for growing science and technology.
March 22nd, 2008 at 4:15 pm
Duh !!! Weird.
I am wondering how he conceived ? ? ?
I mean “how”..
March 22nd, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Why do you say it as a bad example Rachel? I thought girls would appreciate it.
March 22nd, 2008 at 5:11 pm
he he he , quite interesting
..
i’m in deep thinking that how baby will come out , definitely not through his back.If comes from there then surely it’ll be called as something else.
And no separate ports for men to deliver baby.
Only one way is oepration…
March 22nd, 2008 at 8:36 pm
I’d like to know how this thing actually works.
March 22nd, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Yeah how this happened. And where is this foetus growing
There is no possible way of getting the baby out without a cesarian
And this sounds terribly unnatural, he may just grow the baby inside, but he of course needs a women to nourish it with the milk
March 23rd, 2008 at 4:10 am
Obviously cesarian only gautham.
I have no idea on how this works. May be this is called test tube baby.
March 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
@Hari,
Are you sure this is an actual Time cover ? I am not so sure about it. I tried searching their archives and didn’t find anything on sim ilar lines. Because if it’s not, then you shoud stop posting silly forwards.
And the movie is Kindergarten Cop, no ?
March 23rd, 2008 at 5:19 pm
It seems to be true.
http://www.malepregnancy.com/science/
But it is highly controversial and some people believe it to be a hoax.
March 23rd, 2008 at 7:10 pm
Thanks Srividya for that link.
@Kathik
Follow that link which Srividya left , you can find the truth.
March 24th, 2008 at 5:21 am
Maybe so. But can someone link the Time cover please ? I didn’t say the story itself was false. I wouldn’t know.
But when you use the Times cover, it adds credibility to the story. And if ther is no such real Time cover, then could as well be a hoax. I mean why would someone want to use the Time cover (unauthorised) if it was really true ?
March 24th, 2008 at 5:25 am
Oh, and the Time cover is definitely fake. (Change Times to Time* in my previous comment)
Here’s another Time cover
http://curiouslee.typepad.com/weblog/2003/11/may_messes_with.html
and unless Time guys are outta their friggin minds, they won’t cover the same guy in two covers. (and that too with other details missing)
March 24th, 2008 at 5:38 am
In the future the distinction between genders will continue to be blurred. It is inevitable.
March 24th, 2008 at 11:19 am
Leave about the cover karthik,
was the news true or false? thats the question now.
March 24th, 2008 at 4:21 pm
If it is true, why would they even need to use a fake Time cover ?
And a link proves nothing. Thinking about it, if it was/is true, don’t you think mainstream media will be covering it like mad ?
But then, I still cannot overrule a possibility that it’s true. I just feel it is not.
March 24th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
Get a load of this:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa100400a.htm
Seems Karthik may be right after all.
March 24th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Come on Karthik. Speak out now.
March 25th, 2008 at 4:40 am
Strange one…. I can’t think of it.
March 26th, 2008 at 6:39 am
Speak out what ? I thought I made my point.
March 26th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
I mean look out the link which Srividya send it at last. (comment-16)
March 27th, 2008 at 6:03 am
I did and I thought it agreed with me in that it was all a FAKE. What was the impression you got ?
July 30th, 2010 at 2:27 pm
…
This is definately one particular from the ideal blogs I’ve sen in ages on the web. Keep up the great posts….